3种不同超促排卵方案在高龄患者体外受精-胚胎移植中的临床效果分析Clinical efficacy of three controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols in advanced age undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer
杨菁;冯亭亭;孙伟;冯雪花;冯晓军;贾婷;
摘要(Abstract):
目的:探讨高龄(3645岁)患者采用不同超促排卵方案对体外受精-胚胎移植周期妊娠结局的影响。方法:回顾分析484个周期的高龄患者的资料,根据促排卵方案不同将患者分组:GnRH-a长方案组(148个周期)、拮抗剂方案组(165个周期)、GnRHa超短方案组(171个周期),比较3组患者的基本资料及临床结局。结果:GnRH-a长方案组的h CG日LH水平低于拮抗剂方案组和GnRH-a超短方案组,GnRH-a长方案组的Gn时间最长,获卵数、2PN受精数、2PN卵裂数、优质胚胎数及冷冻数最多(P<0.05);GnRH-a超短方案组的Gn用量最多,2PN受精数、2PN卵裂数最少(P<0.05)。3组的h CG日子宫内膜厚度、新鲜周期胚胎移植数、周期取消率、早期流产率、活产率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);胚胎种植率及临床妊娠率:GnRH-a长方案组最高,GnRH-a超短方案组最低,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对于卵巢储备功能相对较好的高龄患者,GnRH-a长方案具有较好的临床结局;对于卵巢储备较差者,拮抗剂方案Gn用量相对少,临床结局尚可,是一种可选择的比较经济的方案。
关键词(KeyWords): 高龄;体外受精-胚胎移植;GnRH-a长方案;拮抗剂方案;GnRH-a超短方案
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Authors): 杨菁;冯亭亭;孙伟;冯雪花;冯晓军;贾婷;
DOI: 10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2016.11.007
参考文献(References):
- [1]Serour G,Mansour R,Serour A,et al.Analysis of 2,386consecutive cycles of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection using autologous oocytes in women aged 40 years and above[J].Fertil Steril,2010,94(5):1707-1712
- [2]Xu HJ,Ji XW,Hong Y,et al.Mini-dose GnRH-a long versus short protocol in patients≥35 years old undergoing in vitro fertilization[J].Gynecol Endocrinol,2014,30(7):498-501
- [3]Marinakis G,Nikolaou D.National survey of the current management of infertility in women aged 40 and over in the UK[J].J Obstet Gynaecol,2012,32(4):375-378
- [4]Fang C,Huang R,Li TT,et al.Day-2 and day-3 sequential transfer improves pregnancy rate in patients with repeated IVF-embryo transfer failure:a retrospective case-control study[J].Reprod Biomed Online,2013,26(1):30-35
- [5]Wang YA,Healy D,Black D,et al.Age-specific success rate for women undertaking their first assisted reproduction technology treatment using their own oocytes in Australia,2002-2005[J].Hum Reprod,2008,23(7):1633-1638
- [6]Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.Aging and infertility in women[J].Fertil Steril,2006,86(5 Suppl 1):S248-252
- [7]Ou J,Xing W,Li Y,et al.Short versus long gonadotropinreleasing hormone analogue suppression protocols in IVF/ICSI cycles in patients of various age ranges[J].PLo S One,2015,10(7):e0133887
- [8]Klipstein S,Regan M,Ryley DA,et al.One last chance for pregnancy:a review of 2,705 in vitro fertilization cycles initiated in women age 40 years and above[J].Fertil Steril,2005,84(2):435-445
- [9]Sahmay S,Oncul M,Tuten A,et al.Anti-mullerian hormone levels as a predictor of the pregnancy rate in women of advanced reproductive age[J].J Assist Reprod Genet,2014,31(11):1469-1474
- [10]Eftekhar M,Mohammadian F,Yousefnejad F,et al.Microdose GnRH agonist flare-up versus ultrashort GnRH agonist combined with fixed GnRH antagonist in poor responders of assisted reproductive techniques cycles[J].Int J Fertil Steril,2013,6(4):266-271
- [11]Tutuncu L,Dundar O.Increasing the stimulation dose of r FHS in unexpected poor responders is not associated with better IVF outcome[J].Ginekol Pol,2012,83(2):111-115
- [12]苏琼,伍琼芳,田莉峰,等.高龄患者体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)不同促排卵方案的临床分析[J].江西医药,2014,49(8):723-725
- [13]Baart EB,Martini E,Eijkemans MJ,et al.Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo:a randomized controlled trial[J].Hum Reprod,2007,22(4):980-988
- [14]Xiao J,Chang S,Chen S,et al.The effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Fertil Steril,2013,100(6):1594-1601.e1-9